>>>>> "wayne" == wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
wayne> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andrew wayne> Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> But since you brought this up: if you (the author of the >> document) do not consider this to be an experiment, then >> perhaps the IETF should not publish SPF as an Experimental RFC. wayne> I asked for the IESG to not consider the SPF I-D to be wayne> experiemental. It was turned down. According to Ted, wayne> *none* of the IESG members expressed interest in changing wayne> the status from Experiemental. As a point of fact, I only saw requests from you to publish as a proposed standard or some other standards track document rather than experimental. Of course I would not have seen private communication between you and Ted. however if you do not consider SPF an experiment, standards track is not the only status to consider. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf