Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it

[Michael Thomas]

Ned Freed wrote:

If I were to object to Eliot's proposal (I don't - in fact I strongly support it), it would be on the grounds that the IETF should be taking a long hard look at the issues surrounding call home in general, not just in the special case of

SNMP.

I'll bite: what could the IETF do if it looked
long and hard?

                Mike

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf