In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Nicholas Staff" writes:
> > I hope that we can discuss this as soon as possible. Until then, I
>> will try to refrain from sending any more messages on this topic as I
>> don't believe that this will be productive. People on this mail list
>> might want to consider to do the same thing.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David Kessens
>> Operations & Management Area Director
>
>I agree this is not the forum for this discussion, but since you publicized
>your attack I think he's entitled to at least one public dissent. I'd be
>happy to agree with you by the way if you could show me anything that
>amounted to the abuse you claim (abuse from Dean that is). Anyway, barring
>that I'll list the 1,000 reasons why I think you're wrong in my email to the
>IESG.
I'm sorry, David's note wasn't an "attack" -- it was David excercising
his responsibility as an AD. Have a look at Section 2 of RFC 3683 --
to revoke someone's posting rights, he *must* make a public statement
on the IETF mailing list.
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
