Christian Huitema wrote:
Hence the desire to have the RFC Editor use xml2rfc, rather than
nroff.
I don't think publishing the xml2rfc test is such a good idea. Xml2rfc
is a preparation format. The printed result is a combination of the
xml2rfc input and a formatting program of some kind. This formatting
program is bound to change over time, e.g. when templates change. You
want to archive the final result, not the initial input.
...
*I* would want to archive both.
Best regards, Julian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
