|
Thanks,
Spencer
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 8:46
AM
Subject:
draft-hartmans-mailinglist-experiment
I think Sams proposed experiment is a very good idea. I do have
some thoughts, but my support doesn't hinge on their incorporation
and I'm in favor of the draft either way.
In my opinion these should be experiments of process rather than
penalty. I feel like since the severity of a ban legnth is subjective
and since different cases will warrant different legnths we might do better
(i.e. have less things to disagree on) if all experiments
assumed the same ban legnth. I was also thnking that if
everyone agreed this was a process experiment then I'd like to suggest that
all experiments be mock in the sense that the decisions are not actually
carried out. I think doing it that way would give us greater
freedom to experiment. Also I figure anyone banned by an
experimental process is going to make a lot of noise in the appeals process
and we might start to annoy our counterparts who have to hear them?
These are just my thoughts and I'm not tied to any of them so you risk no
argument by disagreeing.
nick
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing
list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
|
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
