I wish to comment on the draft, but wish to do so no earlier than a week after the IESG hands down its decision, for the reasons given in an earlier mail to this list today.
Harald --On 31. januar 2006 21:42 -0500 Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As many have noticed, I have prepared a draft on an RFC 3933 experiment for mailing list management. The goal is to give very liberal powers to the IESG equivelent to the powers originally given to the IESG under RFC 2418 for working group lists over all IETF lists. The main reason for an experiment is that I believe that we can get this published fast and a new BCP will take a while. I clearly need to make the following changes: 1) Incorporate the IAB appeal response. 2) Make it clear that this applies to non-wg lists and to clarify what an IETF list is. John Klensin has supplied excellent text for this. I'm also asking the IESG to comment on whether they would find the experiment useful. I think one of the major requirements for an RFC 3933 experiment is whether the stakeholders would find the experiment useful. So I need to see if the IESG even wants this. I'm interested in feedback on the following issues: * Is 18 months too long for the experiment. I don't think so but have received one comment requesting 12 months. * Are there limits that need to be placed on the IESG's authority? My preference is to grant the same authority available under RFC 2418 for WG lists to all IETF lists. * Are there other changes that need to be made? --Sam _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
pgp7T0CRHF8Px.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf