Sam Hartman wrote:
"Ed" == Ed Juskevicius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ed> I wonder if part of the reason is we often resort to a modus
Ed> operandi of "let a thousand flowers bloom" and "let the market
Ed> decide" for contentious issues. While that *might* work for a
Ed> technology spec, it clearly is not a workable means of
Ed> progressing process change proposals.
My argument is that proliferation of competing process change
proposals may well be an appropriate mechanism for RFC 3933
experiments--even when these are significant process experiments. I
think recruiting the stakeholders will provide enough of a gate.
But this is only true if the community buys into the approach .
There could be simultaneous proposals of course. There could certainly
be simultaneous process experiments. However, I guess there couldn't
be simultaneous process experiments that are inconsistent with
each other.
Brian
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
