Julian Reschke wrote: > Joe Touch schrieb: ... >> And I'm worried about changes to XML that render the result >> uncompilable, not minor text formatting changes. See the changes to 2629 >> (sometimes referred to as 2629bis, although no I-D has been issued - and >> we're currently using this 'bis' version) noted on the xml2rfc pages. >> What happens when a real 'bis' WG is created? will the current changes >> be supported into the future or not? > > Do you have any evidence of non-backwards compatible changes that > occurred in the past?
As I noted off-list, I had this experience, but didn't bother saving the failed file; that was the 'straw' that shifted me over to revising the Word template, and I didn't save the failed version (unfortunately). Joe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
