Hi, > I think that the single change most likely to keep WGs on track is to ensure > that they do not have a single dominant participant, eg one who is both chair > and > author of key I-Ds. The WGs I see most at risk of going round in circles > and/or > producing output that falls short of what is needed are ones such. > > Some time ago, I did hear an IESG member talk of this in such a way as to make > me think that this was an understood problem, but nothing seems to have > changed > in the two or so years since then. >
Perhaps it is an unwritten rule, but I thought this battle was fought and won years ago. Perhaps you should discuss the specific problem with the AD and or the IESG. I can't recall the last time I was involved in a group in which the chair played an active role in authoring. And as someone who did that way many years ago, I strongly advise against it. > And, of course, I believe that there is more to good engineering than just > engineering eg the right processes. > Ding ding! Eliot _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
