Dave Crocker writes... > The key point is having a status that is determined by > market penetration, rather than technical details. Proposed > is for the technical work. Full is for market success.
That sounds reasonable. > By way of providing some incentive, I suggest that Proposed > have a limit, such as 3 or 5 years (and, yes, we can quibble > about that, too.) If the work cannot gain sufficient adoption > by the end of that time, it has failed and warrants moving to > Historic. I think that may be too harsh, if there has been some adoption in the market but less than "sufficient" adoption (however we define that). Perhaps moving to Informational would be more appropriate, in those cases. Regards, Dave Nelson _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
