On 9/6/06, Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:Robert> How do we test "universal interoperability"? MUSTs need to Robert> be testable. Musts do not need to be testable.
So the definition of "supports universal interoperability" is "I know it when I see it"? Which IETF protocols are universally interoperable? I think of SMTP and HTTP. I also asked you two questions. Here is the second: And why would we put the definition in Brian's document? -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time." _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
