<inline> Tom Petch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henning Schulzrinne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "lconroy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <ietf@ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2007 6:36 PM Subject: Re: Identifying mailing list for discussion(Re: Tracking resolution of DISCUSSes)
> > > > > > The table of mappings constitutes an on-going administrative > > challenge. Also as noted, not all I-Ds are tied to working groups. > > > > But every draft should be able to fit into one of the IETF areas; Not sure about the should but the really is that they do not. One close to my heart is URI which belongs in every area which has a protocol:-) The practicality is that it is hosted outside the IETF and a recent post there, relating to a very worthy piece of work, asked how to get this to be an RFC. Such questions show that we are not doing as well as we SHOULD. > all > areas have, as far as I know, area-wide mailing lists. At least for > TSV, the list has often been used as a catch-all for things that > didn't quite fit elsewhere. > > Setting up a mailing list for each personal draft, with unclear 'note > well' rules and archiving status, seems counterproductive. > > > > d/ > > > > -- > > > > Dave Crocker > > Brandenburg InternetWorking > > bbiw.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Ietf mailing list > > Ietf@ietf.org > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
