John C Klensin wrote: > If the IESG intends this document to merely represent the > particular procedures they intend to follow within the range of > alternatives over which they believe they have discretion, then > it should probably be published as an ION
Not publishing it at all is an alternative. It would send an unmistakable message to wannabe-authors, that they should use the "independent" path, unless they're a friend of a friend of an AD. Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
