>>>>> "Blake" == Blake Ramsdell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Blake> OK, let me back up and explain the events as I see them and Blake> try to clarify. And I am certainly welcome to any comments Blake> or criticism about what my role is or how I should proceed Blake> with this. Blake> * My job as WG chair is to make sure that the editor (Russ) Blake> has created a draft that incorporates what we consider to Blake> be the rough consensus of the working group. Blake> * You had some comments on this draft. Some of your Blake> comments were incorporated. Some of your comments had zero Blake> support from the WG members on the working group mailing Blake> list. Clarifications welcome as to exactly who else Blake> supported these comments. You also have a job to make sure WG last call comments are responded to and that technical issuse are addressed. For the issues Denis raised, I'm also probably going to require something stronger than "No one agreed." I'd like to know why he's wrong. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf