Brian,
My view may be no surprise to you.
All reviews (including GenArt) and the subsequent discussions should be
copied to *some* mailing list so that the whole process is both public and
archived.
Copying the WG mailing list would be best, but may be a pain because the
reviewer is not usually subscribed and this may introduce delays while
postings are authorised (of course, there is nothing to stop the reviewer
subscribing). Posting to a GenArt-Review mailing list would be less
acceptable because the I-D authors/editors are not usually able to subscribe
and would not normally monitor such a list.
The main IETF mailing list is a compromise, but not particularly good as it
may obscure the other traffic on the list.
Adrian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Brian E Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "IETF discussion list" <ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 12:33 PM
Subject: About Gen-ART reviews
Hi,
As devoted readers may have noticed, quite a few Gen-ART reviews
have been copied to this list recently, with follow-up postings
in some cases.
Is this a good or a bad thing?
Comments welcome.
Brian (as General AD)
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf