>>>>> "Steven" == Steven M Bellovin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steven> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 21:14:35 -0800
Steven> "Joseph Salowey (jsalowey)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would like to understand better why ... no automated key
>> management is specified.
>>
Steven> Do they cite any of the reasons listed in RFC 4107?
No.
Bill gave me a heads up about this a while back because I'd indicated
I would hold a discuss on the next document to do this. I could not
get together the energy to engage with the WG and cause them to design
a security architecture for PIM.
I at least am planning to abstain on this document because the AD
tried to engage and I failed. I don't think it's good technology for
this not to have automated key management though.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
