>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Sayre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Robert> Sam Hartman wrote:
>> My preference is to resolve this by making 2818 normative; I
>> believe we've already 3967'd 2818 so we don't need an
>> additional last call on this one.
>>
Robert> Is RFC 2818 sufficient to ensure interoperability? It
Robert> would be quite easy for two implementations to claim to
Robert> implement "TLS" and fail to interoperate. RFC 4346
Robert> contains mandatory cipher suites. Without those,
Robert> conformant implementations could fail during
Robert> authentication setup, right? The same danger would exist
I think both 2818 and 4346 contain important details and need to be
normative.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
