The intended status of the draft itself is Informational rather than Historic, surely?

The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:

- 'Reclassification of RFC 3525 to Historic '
   <draft-taylor-megaco-obsol3525-01.txt> as a Historic

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2007-06-08. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-taylor-megaco-obsol3525-01.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=15996&rfc_flag=0


_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to