Paul Hoffman wrote: > Why not? As long as the reader of the IANA registry can ascertain > which codepoint owner is at a particular level, how would that affect > interop?
Being able to ascertain what the level is isn't enough; you also need to know (and more importantly, care) about the differences in the levels :-) I'd say there are lot of implementors who don't really care that much for the distinctions between an individual Internet-Draft, a WG draft, an Experimental RFC, or Proposed Standard RFC. But if only the latter two (or three) would have proper numbers in them (instead of TBD-BY-IANA), that would send a clear message that "this not ready yet"... (but of course, this doesn't always work; if there's strong enough pressure to implement, people will "invent" some numbers there) Best regards, Pasi _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
