Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > Dave Crocker writes: >> Bob Hinden wrote: >>> Maybe we are getting to the point in time where we should only have >>> IPv6 at IETF meetings or it that's premature run IPv4 behind a couple >>> of layers of NAT. >> >> On the theory that the ietf meeting net is for production services, >> wouldn't it make sense to have the time to cut over to pure ipv6 be >> when production use of ipv4 becomes minimal? > > IMNSHO, the sensible time is to do it when the relevant RIR runs out of > addresses. I'm sure the IETF can get a couple of thousand IPv4 addresses > for temporary use even years after that time, but it would seem a little > hypocritical to do so. > > The network at both of IETF meetings I've attended felt a little > archaic: abundant addresses, no paperwork, no firewall, no NAT.
So basically, you're complaining that you came to the IETF and received production quality Internet service? > Arnt > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
