On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 09:29 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I posted draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes-00.txt at > Russ Housley's request. Obviously, discussion is very much > wanted. > > Brian > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-carpenter-rfc2026-changes-00.txt > > This document proposes a number of changes to RFC 2026, the basic > definition of the IETF standards process. While some of them are > definite changes to the rules, the intention is to preserve the main > intent of the original rules, while adapting them to experience and > current practice.
In: 3. Detailed Proposals for Change Acronyms could be structured to clarify extensions versus stand-alone. Perhaps acronyms could look something like: SMTP SMTP/Text-Format SMTP/Host-Reqs SMTP/Msg-Size SMTP/Anti-Spam SMTP/Auth SMTP/Pipelining SMTP/Binary-Mime SMTP/TLS SMTP/DSN SMTP/Multipart SMTP/Enhanced-Status SMTP/Ext-DSN SMTP/Auto-Response SMTP/Submission -Doug _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
