> It seems that someone in ARIN land believes that IPv6 addresses are
> scarce resources that need to be carefully dribbled out to customers
> according to need. The following proposal has just been formally made to
> change ARIN's allocation policy.
for the world peace, as long as it does not have impact to global
routing table (= do not leak out on cross-AS border) it is fine.
for the ease of use for customers, it is a no-no, because they would
like to use /48 always. if they get /62 or something they will need
to get more prefixes again and again, and/or the amount of addresses
would affect the address allocation policy towards the customer network
subnets.
so, i would like to say "do not do this". is it too late or still
possible?
itojun
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
