>>>>> "Eric" == Eric Rescorla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eric> Well, the difference is in part the IESG note. More Eric> importantly, the question is whether the IESG intends to Eric> hold future work to the requirements in this document. If Eric> they do, then this document needs significantly more review Eric> and a much stronger showing of consensus. Arguably, if they Eric> do it should be required to be PS or BCP. Obviously as an individual, I disagree that it would be necessary for significantly more review to take place. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf