> > because, in the end, ULA (whichever flavor it is) leads to
> > IPv6-to-IPv6 NAT.
>
> I prefer losing some bytes in all my packets between locations using
> different ULA-D prefixes to get an underlying VPN / tunneling
> infrastructure. This allows me to keep things flat, i.e. pure routing.
>
> itojun, let's just stop using the 3 letters word. It does not exist
> anymore.
is it ULA, NAT, VPN or all of them :-)
itojun
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
