On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 07:21:55PM -0700,
 Paul Hoffman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote 
 a message of 35 lines which said:

> Could you give an example of an WG in which this would have been
> preferable?

MARID, certainly.

> Yes, there are a few engineers in the IETF who like to play armchair
> lawyer and would love to spend the initial time of WG formation
> pontificating about IPR, but they are in the small minority. Such a
> discussion would be of no interest to the folks who want to do good
> technical work.

You mean that everyone who disagrees with the current IPR policy of
IETF is not wanting to do good technical work? And that people
genuinely interested in a better IPR policy are just "armchair
lawyers"? Seems quite despising.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to