On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 07:09:54PM +0200, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> > And I would argue that the above issue is not a matter of concern to
> > the IETF. Having a reference implementation to encourage adoption of
> > the spec, that is of IETF's concern. The issue of GPL requirements
> > is, I would argue, Not Our Problem.
>
> Is it really your position that that is in no case a concern that IETF
> should consider???
>
> For an extreme example, consider hypothetically the case that an
> essential part of the IPv6 protocol stack had such a patent issue.
I was thinking mainly about protocols used by application programs. I
agree that something essential needed for IPv6, that might be
something that an individual wg might want to consider. But in terms
of a blanket policy that would apply to *ALL* IETF protocols? That
would something that is really NOT an IETF-wide concern.
- Ted
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
