agreed -----Original Message----- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 8:48 AM To: Sam Hartman; Leslie Daigle Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; IESG; ietf@ietf.org Subject: RE: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: PerformanceMetrics atOther Layers (pmol)]
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sam Hartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 10:24 PM > To: Leslie Daigle > Cc: IESG; ietf@ietf.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PMOL] Re: A question about [Fwd: WG Review: > Performance Metrics atOther Layers (pmol)] > > >>>>> "Leslie" == Leslie Daigle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I doubt I'll use the output in security protocols. > Isn't it true that best security protocol designs always take performance aspects into account, because users will turn off the security features if they deem their performance reduction too great? So measuring the performance of security protocols and the impact of activating security on other protocols and applications seems to be important. Dan _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
