Michael Dillon wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, you are the developer, not the set of > end users. In which case your personal preferences are not > relevant.
They are relevant in the sense that *I* decide what I want to spend *my* time on. I'm open to suggestions and good ideas, but what gets implemented isn't decided by the set of end users. > If you can provide a choice of two feeds, one using > RSS and one using ATOM, then why can't you also offer a > summary feed and a full content feed? I might. What would you suggest including in these feeds? In other words, what to include/omit in the summary feed? And what should the "full" content feed look like? (How should the draft abstracts etc. be shown?) <snip> > P.S. I thought this was part of the site redevelopment using > Django but perhaps I was mistaken. It is not (and I'm actually using Perl instead of Django). Best regards, Pasi _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
