> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 05:11:47PM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> >
> > > Mark Andrews wrote:
> > > >> Hello Ray ,
> > > >>
> > > Brian
> >
> > You need both physical (power, hardware, location) and
> > operational (different global prefixes, preferably different
> > AS's) diversity for reliable DNS.
> >
> > It's clear from the infomation above that the later is not
> > being met.
> >
> > Mark
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
>
> it -could- be that these are two XEN images on the ssmae
> box. HOWEVER. the point remains taht Ray explicitly
> told us that this was a transitional attribute that
> would be corrected before the transition was complete.
>
> so take a breath, go out and cut the grass (or burn it off)
> and try not to micro-manage the transition... this is
> one of those cases where operational expedience and a
> desire to let folks know what is happening seems to have caused
> an over reaction.
I hope they correctly manage the transition. By that I
mean that all nameservers (both old and new) serve the
*same* zone content during the transition. Otherwise
there will be servers that will stay locked on the
old nameservers until they cease to serve the zone.
Mark
> as usual, YMMV
>
> --
> --bill
>
> Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
> certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
