On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:09:28PM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Bill Manning wrote:
>
> > as offical spokesmodel for the IETF in your role
> > as Sgt at Arms, your you SURE you want to advocate
> > the IETF abandon its published statement wrt there
> > being ONE ROOT ...
>
> Our interpretation of "a sergeant-at-arms appointed by the
> Chair is empowered to restrict posting by a person, or of
> a thread, when the content is inappropriate and represents
> a pattern of abuse" is apparently different, I don't see
> an "official spokesmodel" in RFC 3005.
>
> I've no idea who is a sergeant-at-arms here at the moment,
> and Ted certainly didn't post in this role. Correct me
> if I'm wrong, "one root" is an IAB doctrine, isn't it ?
> Did the IETF ever bother to confirm it ?
>
> Frank
>
my appologies to Ted, you happend to be the nearest
lighting rod.
Frank, to your question. RFC 3245 section 2.2
--bill
Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
