> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The first of the two comments below is probably
> primarily the IESG's concern, although it affects the IETF last call.
> The second comment is a more general issue.
>
> Comments:
> This document requests assignment of a Diameter Command Code.
> As this requires "IETF Consensus" additional care may
> be needed to ensure that the Last Call produces clarity on
> the required consensus.
> It would seem appropriate for the last call announcement to
> have indicated this requirement. It is difficult to claim
> "IETF Consensus"
> from the typical non-response to IETF last call for
> informational documents.
>
Hi Joel,
Thank you for catching this. I have required the Secretariat to re-issue
the Last Call with the clarification of the issue you are pointing to.
Dan
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
