Michael Dillon wrote: > In that case, this is *NOT* truly net-utf8 as one would > understand it in normal English. Instead it is the Unicode > version of NVT.
It's the UTF-8 version of net-ascii. Admittedly I had no idea what "net-ascii" is until I read John references to RFCs with numbers below 821, excl. lost in space RFC 97 ;-) <http://purl.net/xyzzy/-a9/netascii%20OR%20%22net-ascii%22> Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
