--On Sunday, March 09, 2008 22:45:33 -0400 Ted Hardie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This particular ION had a life as an internet-draft with an intent to > publish it as an RFC before the ION series existed. It was draft-iesg at > one time, and no one came up with a draft-ietfer- counter proposal. But > our mechanisms for allowing that kind of publication have years of > experience behind them. Not so much for community commentary > on IONs, IESG statements, or the like, which have tended to be perceived > as changeable only by replacing the sitting IESG. my memory says that "discuss criteria" started out as an I-D, but with no consensus (or even a clear idea) on how to get a referenceable publication of it. It was one of the exampels that made me suggest IONs, exactly for that reason - RFC just didn't seem to fit. Harald _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf