> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Jari Arkko > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2008 7:04 PM > To: Bernard Aboba > Cc: ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Re: IETF Last Call on Walled Garden Standard for the Internet > > Bernard, > > For what it is worth, this ex-EAP co-chair also thinks that > the use of EAP keys for applications is a very bad idea.
Why? > And I too am concerned about introducing walled gardens through this. Why? > Having said that, I think there are legitimate uses of EMSK > in the area of network access, such as various fast handover > proposals in EAP. My understanding is that HOKEY is working > on this. So perhaps one potential direction for resolving > your issues is to provide a much stricter IANA section and an > applicability note. Sure based on technical merits not FUD. > I realize that this does not prevent people from grabbing > values. But I note that I know of one case at least where > this has already happened, even without an IETF > specification. Arguably the situation with a (sufficiently > tight) spec might be better, because we can use the spec to > explain what usage is inappropriate. Why? > I realize we have RFC > 3748 already, but since use of EMSK has been an IETF topic > for 5+ years, I think it would be reasonable to state what > the final rules are on taking specific keys out of the EMSK. Sure based on technical merits and not FUD. _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
