+1 from me. The role of the Trust Chair used to be pretty lightweight: either it still is, and Harald's advice is sound (get clerical help), or it no longer is, and a more detailed explanation of the experienced change would be helpful to the community being asked for comment.
Leslie. --On April 4, 2008 11:50:23 AM +0200 Harald Alvestrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After considering the comments so far, I think I disagree with having a > separate Trust chair. > > The idea behind making the IAOC be the Trustees was, among other things, > to make sure that we didn't create yet another nexus of control in the > labyrinth of committees; I understood the legal existence of the > Trustees as something different (in name) from the IAOC to be strictly > something we did for legal purposes > > If the IAOC chair is overburdened by having to manage the IAOC in two > different contexts, get him (or her) a secretary. > > I agree with John's comment that leaving the current trustees in charge > on dissolution of the IAOC is inappropriate; for one thing, that also > removes all the recall mechanisms. > Figure out something else to do in this case. > > Harald > _______________________________________________ > IETF mailing list > IETF@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
