Russ, > When IETF lists are housed somewhere other than ietf.org, they are > supposed to include an archive recipient so that there is an archive > available at ietf.org (perhaps in addition to the one kept at the > place where the list is housed). >
I'll agree with Phill's conclusion on this one. I think there is probably convenience value to housing the mailing lists at the IETF. It allows for a single whitelist, reduction in those annoying monthly messages that we eventually all filter into the bitbucket. Also, it probably is easier to effect and audit policy (such as we have any) in terms of message retention, uniform access, etc. Regards, Eliot _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
