On 2008-04-15 00:35 Ned Freed said the following: >> On 2008-04-14 23:11 Ned Freed said the following:
> I guess I should be flattered, but really, I fail to see why. Guaranteed > bypass > of moderation is simply an allowed-poster whitelist. So it seems to me that you've failed to see the problem. Anybody who considers themselves a valid poster is supposed to be able to bypass moderation, challenge-response and spam-filtering. This would also include a spammer who considers himself a valid poster. At the same time, the IETF lists MUST provide spam control. I see this as a contradiction in the announced text. In other words, if one is not already on a whitelist, how does one get on to it, automatically, without moderation and challenge-response, while spam-filtering is still provided? Henrik _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf