On 6/17/2008 9:45 AM, Dave Crocker wrote: > > > Lakshminath Dondeti wrote: >> Hi David, >> >> Thank you for sharing this information. Now that the community knows >> this, perhaps this will be an option when there are snags in the >> process in future. > > > Folks keep missing the point: The current situation is not about > lacking creativity or options. It is about having rules but failing to > follow them or inventing them on the fly.
I am not claiming that not having precedence (which is now corrected to widely-known precedence) is the only problem. However, there is a point here in that if one or two ADs are "failing to follow [rules] or inventing them on the fly," what are the rest of the IESG members doing? I have received a few responses, offline and in this thread to that question. regards, Lakshminath > > What David's note underscores is that it is entirely possible to take > even a difficult Discuss and attempt to pursue it actively and > constructively. > > His seeking to assess consensus within the IESG is an exemplary case of > trying to work as a team rather than an 'expert' individual. > > d/ > _______________________________________________ IETF mailing list IETF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
