Mmm... as editor of the document, maybe I should explain how this document came into existence several years ago. It was back then that the IESG got many many documents that had a lot of these simple (and easy to fix) issues. Some look like showstoppers, others are not so much showstoppers, but they do take extra time (of many people) if they need to be fixed once the document goes into IETF Last Call. So in order to try and make doument authors/editors and also WG chairs aware of what the many little errors were that we as IESG often saw, we composed this document.
Hope this helps, Bert Wijnen > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Pete > Resnick > Verzonden: dinsdag 8 juli 2008 21:28 > Aan: ietf@ietf.org > CC: IETF Chair; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: Re: Call for review of proposed update to ID-Checklist > > > The document says: > > "If ABNF is used, you MUST include a normative reference to RFC 4234." > > To quote two fine radio personalities here in the states, this one > seems "boooooooooogus". Yes, any I-D that uses ABNF must include a > normative reference to RFC 4234, but for the IESG to not engage in > review until it is in there is silly beyond belief. Make a note to > the author that they need the reference and continue consideration. > > pr > -- > Pete Resnick <http://www.qualcomm.com/~presnick/> > Qualcomm Incorporated - Direct phone: (858)651-4478, Fax: (858)651-1102 > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
