John C Klensin wrote: > I continue to believe that the IESG could do something much easier > and much more effective by issuing, not a collection of new rules, > but a simple statement requiring that people either use > suitably-reserved and dedicated identifiers or that they explain, > explicitly and subject to community review, why not.
I think that's pretty much what we tried to do, but apparently, the text doesn't quite read that way (and I agree that it's quite long). Best regards, Pasi _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
