Actually, there is a grain of a good idea here that I'd like to extract. I wouldn't create two places to send comments and attempt to segregate who can post to which group. However, creating an ietf-comm...@ietf.org email list and asking >all< last call comments to be sent to that email list has possibilities.
On 2/12/09, Noel Chiappa <j...@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote: > I've heard from a number of the FSF thundering herd people to the effect of > 'but the announcement says send email to ietf@ietf.org". (They're > conveniently ignoring the fact that it says "the IETF community" all over the > place in the Last Call, but never mind.) > > So clearly we need to change it to say something like: > > Members of the IETF can send email to i...@ietf.org. Members of the public > to whom this Last Call is forwarded, you can send email to > ietf-comm...@ietf.org, but we cannot guarantee to do anything with comments > at such a late stage in the process. Please join the IETF if you wish to > influence standards while the are being worked on; see > http://www.ietf.org/<mumble> for instructions on how to do that. > > (For "Members of the IETF" we can substitute "People who are subscribed to > the IETF Discussion list", if people think that is needed in place of the > technically somewhat nebulous "Members of the IETF".) > > And hopefully we can get a few brave souls to volunteer to read ietf-comment, > and send on any comments which are novel and or important. > > Noel > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > -- Clint (JOATMON) Chaplin Principal Engineer Corporate Standardization (US) SISA _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
