Tony Hansen wrote:
Should it be using RFC5321/RFC5322 instead of RFC2821/RFC2822, such as RFC5322.From instead of RFC2822.From?
yes. current draft came out just before the latest RFCs were published. final publication will be revised (and nits fixed -- thanks for the close read.) d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
