Shouldn't the document reference RFC5321 and RFC5322 instead of the older ones?

--
Sincerely

Hector Santos
http://www.santronics.com

Dave CROCKER wrote:

Folks,

After 5 years and 11 public versions, the email-arch document has finally made its way into the formal IETF standardization process, starting with a Last Call for comments from the community.

The document is available in several formats from:

   <http://bbiw.net/recent.html#emailarch>

The HTML and PDF versions include figures that are markedly easier to view than the ASCII art in the (official) txt version...


The document is an individual submission. Although many people have contributed to it, it was not the product of a working group. So the IESG cannot presume it has support. Hence, the Last Call of an individual submission carries an extra burden, to assess the amount of support that the document has from the community. This requires affirmative postings from the community.

However verbose or terse, positive or negative, it will aid the IESG's assessment to see postings from you about whether to make "Internet Mail Architecture" an IETF standard. In particular, note the enclosed announcement's:

"Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-03-26."


Thanks.

d/

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Last Call: draft-crocker-email-arch (Internet Mail Architecture) to Proposed Standard
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:10:17 -0800 (PST)
From: The IESG <iesg-secret...@ietf.org>
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-annou...@ietf.org>

The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider
the following document:

- 'Internet Mail Architecture '
   <draft-crocker-email-arch-11.txt> as a Proposed Standard

The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action.  Please send substantive comments to the
ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-03-26. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.

The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-crocker-email-arch-11.txt


IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=11811&rfc_flag=0

The following IPR Declarations may be related to this I-D:



_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
ietf-annou...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce




_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to