At 8:30 PM -0500 2/27/09, John C Klensin wrote: >Instead, it >references (given how little text is in the Internationalization >section, "incorporates by reference" might be more accurate) a >somewhat-outdated private consortium document that has never had >anything resembling formal IETF review.
+1. I am slowly going through draft-crocker-email-arch, but when I saw John bring this up, I thought it had to be a mistake. I haven't touched the reference in question in over a decade. (There is no URL for the document in the draft, but it can be found at <http://www.imc.org/mail-i18n.html>.) For those of you checking your chronometers, that means it predates IDNs, much less EAI. It should not be referenced in a modern architecture document. --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
