And, just to point out the most interesting text on the page that Mary
referenced:
Q: How can I join the Gen-ART review team?
A: Interested volunteers should contact the General Area director, listed on
the membership page.
:-)
Thanks,
Spencer
Yes, every document that goes through IETF-LC is assigned one gen-art
reviewer to review the document, but the gen-art review process isn't
really a formal part of the IETF document process - it happens in
parallel with IETF-LC and the reviews are done on behalf of the General
Area director. It would not be possible for us to cover all the docs
with more than one reviewer - the team is quite small. The reality
(from my experience) seems to be that the only reviews you can count on
during IETF-LC are those from gen-art, sec-dir (they follow a similar
model as I understand it) and other areas as applicable (e.g., APP, OPS,
etc.). Although some of the latter reviews often happen earlier in the
process. Each of the reviews from the Gen-ART team are prefaced with a
link to a Gen-ART FAQ:
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html
Regards,
Mary Barnes
Gen-ART secretary
-----Original Message-----
From: gen-art-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On
Behalf Of Ben Campbell
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 9:30 AM
To: Tom.Petch
Cc: General Area Review Team; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review
ofdraft-ietf-isms-transport-security-model-12
On Apr 16, 2009, at 2:29 AM, Tom.Petch wrote:
I am surprised not to have seen more formal reviews of the quartet for
isms I-Ds whose Last Call has just finished, updating as they do a
Standard, while at the same time introducing a Transport subsystem and
model, and also introducing a new (to snmp) way of providing Security.
I do not know what or how these reviews are triggered but I would have
expected a good deal more than this one and the one that appeared as I
was drafting this response, a round dozen even.
Gen-art reviews are assigned to a team of volunteers (i.e. the general
area review team.) I'm not sure about the assignment criteria, but I
_think_ we try to catch most, if not every, draft being IETF last called
for publication.
Tom Petch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Campbell" <b...@estacado.net>
To: <i...@hardakers.net>; <dharring...@huawei.com>; "General Area
Review Team"
<gen-...@ietf.org>
Cc: <j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de>; <ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 10:05 PM
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-isms-transport-security-
model-12
<snip>
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
gen-...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
gen-...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
gen-...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf