-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Noel Chiappa wrote: > > From: Stephan Wenger <st...@stewe.org> > > > For the IETF as an organization, I see no value beyond traditions in > > staying with the RFC publication model. (The marketing value of using > > the RFC series is IMHO contradicted by the lack of control of the IETF > > over the RFC series). > > If I understand you correctly, you're suggesting creating a new document > series for use by the IETF, for its standards documents? If so, I don't > recall this possibility being discussed before, although I can't believe it > hasn't been suggested at some point. Well, there's STDs. Do you also want PSTD and DSTD numbers? > Such a change would be acceptable to me - although it might take a while to > build up the distribution system that already exists for RFCs. Using STD/DSTD/PSTD would just be additional numbers. Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) iEYEARECAAYFAkqqbLsACgkQE5f5cImnZrv5WwCg58JSLLQTkOPBJWZzkNx8HyDJ ahkAn2O/m6u2U6jUTxybaR1myDUEwscm =2c62 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf