Hi Ross,

Please see below:

On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Ross Callon wrote:

> Speaking solely as an individual, providing only my personal opinion:
>


Same here.

> I think that this is not acceptable and we should not sign it.
>

Agreed.

> I understand that no location is perfect. However, I think that this goes 
> well beyond what
>  we normally put up with and well beyond what we should put up with.
>
> There are two classes of issues which concern me:
>
> The first is the risk to the IETF. I understand that the likelihood of 
> anything happening
> as a result of this is very low. However, the IETF is a very unruly and
> opinionated group, and is probably more unruly than other groups that
> have recently met in China (or anywhere else). We have little idea what
> IETF attendees will do either in spite of or even because of this
> restriction. It would not be surprising to have some sort of major
> dust-up at the IESG plenary over this issue, and we don't know how the
> host country officials would react to this. Also, while the risk of the
> meeting being stopped in the middle seems very low, if it did happen
> this would be a very bad result for all concerned. If one IETF attendee were 
> to be
> booted out of the hosting country based on something that they said or
> put on their slides or in a jabber room even that would be very bad.
>
> Also, from a moral point of view I don't think that we should accept this. 
> Freedom of
> speech is a very basic freedom that is guaranteed in a wide range of
> countries (although of course not all).  The people who live there don't
> have the ability to say "no" without serious consequences. We DO have
> the ability to say no, and I think that we should.
>

I agree with that. This is basically about freedom of speech. It would be
ironical to host a meeting of the IETF, which stands for open Internet
standards, in a setting which limits open speech.

This is purely my personal opinion as well.

rahul

> Again, this is just my personal opinion, and not the opinion of any
> group nor organization 'that I might happen to be associated with.
>


> thanks, Ross
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: iesg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:iesg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> Marshall Eubanks
> Sent: 18 September 2009 11:42
> To: IETF Announcement list; IETF-Discussion list; Working Group Chairs
> Cc: IAOC Jabberr; IAB IAB; IESG; irtf-ch...@irtf.org
> Subject: Request for community guidance on issue concerning a future meeting 
> of the IETF
>
> Greetings;
>
> We have received numerous suggestions and requests for an IETF meeting
> in China and the IAOC has been working on a potential China meeting for
> several years. We are now close to making a decision on a potential
> upcoming  meeting in China. However, the following issue has arisen
> and we would appreciate your feedback.
>
> The Chinese government has imposed a rule on all conferences held
> since 2008 regarding political speech. A fundamental law in China
> requires that one not criticize the government. Practically, this
> has reference to public political statements or protest marches, which
> are not the IETF's custom. The government, which is a party to the
> issue,
> requires that people who attend conferences in China (the IETF being
> but one example) not engage in political speech during their tour
> in China. We consider this to be acceptable, on the basis that the
> IETF intends to abide by the laws of whatever nations it visits and
> we don't believe that this impacts our ability to do technical work.
>
> The rule is implemented in the Hotel agreement and reads (note that
> the "Client" would be the Host, and the "Group" would be the IETF) :
>
>     "Should the contents of the Group's activities, visual or audio
>     presentations at the conference,or printed materials used at the
>     conference (which are within the control of the Client) contain
>     any defamation against the Government of the People's Republic
>     of China, or show any disrespect to the Chinese culture, or
>     violates any laws of the People's Republic of China or feature
>     any topics regarding human rights or religion without prior
>     approval from the Government of the People's Republic of China,
>     the Hotel reserves the right to terminate the event on the spot
>     and/or ask the person(s) who initiates or participates in any or
>     all of the above action to leave the hotel premises immediately.
>
>     The Client will support and assist the Hotel with the necessary
>     actions to handle such situations. Should there be any financial
>     loss incurred to the Hotel or damage caused to the Hotel's
>     reputation as a result of any or all of the above acts, the Hotel
>     will claim compensation from the Client."
>
> What does this condition mean ? The hotel staff would have, in theory,
> the legal right to shut down the meeting and ask the offending
> participants to leave the property immediately. While we do not
> foresee a situation where such action would take place, we feel that
> it is proper to disclose these conditions to the community.
>
> The members of the IAOC, speaking as individuals, do not like this
> condition as a matter of principle. The IAOC does believe that this
> condition would not prevent the IETF from conducting its business.
>
> We note that the Vancouver/Quebec survey conducted earlier this year
> asked for people to suggest venues in Asia; an overwhelming majority
> (94%) of those who mentioned China were in favor of having a meeting
> there.
>
> We are therefore asking for input from the community by two means - by
> commenting on the IETF discussion list, and also by completing a very
> short survey on people's intentions to travel to China, or not,
> subject to these conditions. This survey can be found here :
>
> https://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=h4DUkRUOdG_2bVLqioPcYYHw_3d_3d
>
> All responses received by October 1, 2009 at  9:00 AM EDT  (1300 UTC)
> will be considered by the IAOC in making its decision. We appreciate
> the assistance of the community in providing us with data that will
> help us to make an informed decision.
>
> Regards
> Marshall Eubanks
> (acting for the IAOC)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Reply via email to