Hi Bob, Thanks for taking the time to read our draft.
We left out the Integrity Algorithm from the referenced list because it is not a ROHC channel parameter, as defined in RFC 3095. Please note that we did include a discussion on the Integrity Algorithm / Key in the subsequent paragraph. As such, I would like to leave the draft as-is. Please let me know if you have any questions. BR, Emre > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert Stangarone [mailto:stang...@nkiconsulting.com] > Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2009 10:53 AM > To: i...@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org > Cc: r...@ietf.org; carl.knuts...@effnet.com; Ertekin, Emre [USA]; > stang...@nkiconsulting.com > Subject: FW: Last Call: draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec > (IPsec Extensions to Support Robust Header Compression over IPsec > (ROHCoIPsec)) to Proposed Standard > > All, > > Sorry for my belated response. This last workweek didn't allow me time > to > respond on the date requested. > > Comments: > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec-05.txt > > - 2.2. Security Association Database (SAD) > > "The ROHC Data Item includes the ROHC channel parameters for the SA. > These > channel parameters (i.e., MAX_CID, PROFILES, MRRU) are enumerated above > in > Section 2.1." > > I think that the "INTEGRITY ALGORITHM" should also be included here: > > "The ROHC Data Item includes the ROHC channel parameters for the SA. > These > channel parameters (i.e., MAX_CID, PROFILES, MRRU, INTEGRITY ALGORITHM) > are > enumerated above in Section 2.1." > > Bob Stangarone > > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-announce-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-announce- > boun...@ietf.org] > On Behalf Of The IESG > Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 6:48 AM > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: r...@ietf.org > Subject: Last Call: draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec (IPsec > Extensions to Support Robust Header Compression over IPsec > (ROHCoIPsec)) to > Proposed Standard > > The IESG has received a request from the Robust Header Compression WG > (rohc) to consider the following document: > > - 'IPsec Extensions to Support Robust Header Compression over IPsec > (ROHCoIPsec) ' > <draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions-hcoipsec-05.txt> as a Proposed > Standard > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2009-09-17. Exceptionally, > comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please > retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > The file can be obtained via > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-rohc-ipsec-extensions- > hcoipse > c-05.txt > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag > =1640 > 9&rfc_flag=0 > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > ietf-annou...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
