Scott,
Good point. Not sure I completely agree on the interpretation
of the current wording, but I agree that it is improved by your
suggestion.
--
Eric Gray
-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Scott
Brim
Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 8:34 AM
To: Lars Eggert
Cc: IETF discussion list
Subject: Re: request for feedback: change to the ID boilerplate
The idea is generally acceptable to me but:
>> Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
>> Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
>> working documents as Internet-Drafts.
While we're at it, these two sentences are contradictory.
"Internet-Drafts are a specific thing" but "some Internet-Drafts may be
something else". Since you have (reasonably) eliminated reference to
areas and working groups, how about modifying this to say
> The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) distributes its working
> documents as Internet-Drafts. Note that other groups may also
> distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts.
?
>> The list of current
>> Internet-Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/.
As Scott Lawrence points out this isn't completely true. How about:
> Current Internet-Drafts are available at
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/.
?
swb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
