Hi, I'm in favour of publishing this document.
I'm wondering which of the two relevant guidelines for Experimental status in http://www.ietf.org/iesg/informational-vs-experimental.html applies in this case. Looking at the writeup in the tracker: "This document presents a working example of the v4/v6 Stateless translation in an operational network, which provides useful information for the interested community." I seem to see a much closer match to guidelines 2 or 3, which lead to Informational. Regards Brian Carpenter On 2009-12-05 03:43, The IESG wrote: > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider > the following document: > > - 'The CERNET IVI Translation Design and Deployment for the IPv4/IPv6 > Coexistence and Transition ' > <draft-xli-behave-ivi-05.txt> as an Experimental RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2010-01-01. Exceptionally, > comments may be sent to i...@ietf.org instead. In either case, please > retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > The file can be obtained via > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-xli-behave-ivi-05.txt > > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=17439&rfc_flag=0 > > _______________________________________________ > IETF-Announce mailing list > ietf-annou...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
